Agentisk procesautomatisering
Mindre manuelt arbejde. Ét arbejdsforløb ad gangen.
SIAX bygger agentisk procesautomatisering, der forenkler og automatiserer gentaget arbejde mellem mennesker og systemer. Vi vurderer værdien, bygger løsningen og følger op på resultatet.
I jeres IT-miljø eller på SIAX-platformen. Omfang og pris aftales før bestilling.
Kartlägg & avgränsa
Verkligt arbete, värde, kontroller
Bygg med kontroll
Agentiskt eller deterministiskt
Drift & uppföljning
Verifiera effekt i praktiken
Detaljerede servicesider og forespørgselsformularen er foreløbig på engelsk.
How an order email moves through the flow
Step 1 of 7The flow starts.
Illustration of an example from the catalogue. Timings are presentation, not measured process time.
The steps as text
- An order email or a PDF containing an order. — System. The flow starts.
- Interpret the material — Agent. The agent reads the material and proposes structured values. The proposal is not a decision.
- Match against data — System. Proposals are matched against Email/IMAP, ERP, CRM, Customer and item master.
- Checks — System. Rules test the details. Whatever fails the check leaves the flow.
- Exception to an owner — Person. The exception goes as an owned task to a named person together with the evidence.
- Review and approval — Person. Review and approval before the order becomes binding.
- A controlled order draft – or an owned exception task. — System. The flow ends here.
Begynd med det faktiske arbejde.
Vælg indgang ud fra det, I ved om processen. Omfang, ansvar, pris og opfølgning aftales før bestilling.
Procesanalyse på stedet
Få et selvstændigt beslutningsgrundlag om, hvad der bør fjernes, forenkles eller automatiseres. Analysen kan afsluttes uden køb af implementering.
Udforsk agentisk procesautomatisering
Har I et tydeligt forløb? Beskriv start, ønsket resultat og systemer. Vi vurderer gennemførligheden og foreslår en afgrænset leverance – agentisk hvor variation kræver det, deterministisk hvor det er nok.
How it works
From process to one scoped flow
We start with the work that is actually performed, not with the tool. One flow at a time, with an owner and explicit boundaries — and the analysis may end without anything being built.
Map
Interviews and source material show where time goes, what governs the work and which exceptions exist. Volume, measures and overlap are recorded per step.
Process analysisDecide
The flow becomes a process object with a version, customer boundaries and an owner. Evidence is bound to that version, so a changed scope is visible.
The process catalogueBuild
Deterministic automation where the rules are known, agentic support where the material is unstructured. Every write goes through a proposal, a policy and an approval.
The three examplesRun and follow up
The flow runs with pause, resume and compensation, and every step is kept as evidence. The effect is measured in the customer workspace, not in a pitch.
Starter scope
The boundary is deliberate: siax.io receives the description and calculates on it. Process objects belong to Processstudio, execution to ACT0 and the workspace to the customer portal.
Value and cost
What the flow can release — and what it costs
Capacity value and economic outcome are calculated separately. A flow can release time without saving a single krona, and save money without releasing any time. Both have to be visible before anything is built.
Capacity value
Released time and added capacity in hours per period, per step — never summed across overlapping steps.
Economic outcome
Reduced expenditure, secured revenue and improved liquidity in kronor, with the assumptions written out.
Cost over time
Start effort, supervision, running cost and ramp-up — including the cost of a flow that does not pay off.
The calculators on this site are examples, not promises. They also show a negative outcome when a flow does not carry itself.
Control and evidence
A person approves — the system executes
An agent never writes directly into a business system. It proposes, the policy tests the proposal, a person approves and every step is recorded. The same chain applies whether the flow is agentic or deterministic.
Approval
The customer's acceptance of the content and the permission to start production are two separate decisions. A saved draft or a filled-in form is neither an order nor a mandate to operate.
Evidence
Every run leaves a trail: proposal, policy decision, approval, outcome. Evidence is bound to a specific version, so a changed scope counts as missing.
Bounded responsibility
siax.io owns no process version and no agent run. That is what lets a customer leave the site without handing over operations.
Measured effect
Time released, reduced expenditure and capacity are reported separately, with period and source. Missing effect is reported too.
The delivery model in three steps
1. Process analysis
A fixed scope: at most three flows, four interviews, a written recommendation. It may end with us declining.
2. The first flow
A fixed quote after the analysis, with scope, gates and acceptance criteria agreed before the build starts.
3. Operations
Optional managed service with monitoring, change control and follow-up of the measured effect.
Evidence
Built, operated and customer result are three different things
Any claim about effect has to trace back to a level. We do not mix them, and we do not call something a customer result unless it was measured at a customer.
01
Built
The code exists, the tests exist and the behaviour can be reviewed in the repository. That says something works — not that anyone uses it.
02
Operated
The flow runs in a real environment with real data, logging and a restart path. That says it holds over time — not that it produced an effect.
03
Customer result
Time, cost or quality is measured before and after at the customer, using the customer's own records. Only then do we call it a result.
A flow that does not pay off is an answer too. The process analysis may end without anything being built, and a negative calculation is reported as negative.