Compare tools
Choose up to 4 tools. Every cell shows the fact and how well it is supported (verified, observed, inferred, stale or unknown). Licence, health and security are compared separately, without a combined score.
Comparison matrix
Data version 794aaf4da7f9. The same link and data version give the same result.
| Fact | Uptime Kuma |
|---|---|
| Licence | |
| Licence (SPDX) | MITVerified |
| Licence status | OSI-approved licenceVerified |
| Licence type | PermissiveVerified |
| Commercial use | AllowedVerified |
| Parts under another licence | None listedVerified |
| Project health | |
| Activity | Not verifiedUnknown |
| Latest release | Not verifiedUnknown |
| Security | |
| Security assessment | Not assessedUnknown |
| Operations and data control | |
| Deployment options | Self-hostedVerified |
| Packaging | docker, docker-composeVerified |
| SSO | UnknownUnknown |
| Where the data is stored | Where you run itInferred |
| SIAX | |
| SIAX status | Run by SIAXVerified |
Everything here is free to use without contacting us. Would you still like help with choosing, running or migrating? or send a request.
Relevant SIAX services
You are comparing Uptime Kuma. An assessment weighs them against your own requirements.
- Technical advisory and architecture review
Independent advice for expensive technical choices: architecture review, tech due diligence, build versus buy and a second opinion.
Ask about this - Systems integration and automation
API integrations and data flows between business systems, CRM, e-commerce and cloud services, so information stops being typed in twice.
Ask about this - DevOps and platform engineering
CI/CD, infrastructure as code and observability, so your team can release often with fewer incidents.
Ask about this